Writing Persuasively Assignment

Assignment: Writing Persuasively

Consider the differences between the characteristics of a literature review for academic writing and the characteristics of a review of literature for the purposes of crafting a compelling and persuasive need statement.

For this Assignment:

  • Review this week’s readings. Pay particular attention to the Persuasive Essay Samples at the Academic Help website as well as the “Why Academics Have a Hard Time Writing Good Grant Proposals” article.
  • Carefully read the Literature Review in the Week 4 Assignment: Writing Persuasively document located in this week’s Learning Resources. Focus on the scenario it describes and consider how the content in this document would be translated into a persuasive argument.

Assignment (1 page)

  • Apply the characteristics of persuasive writing to turn the Literature Review into a persuasive argument.
    Be sure that:
    • The persuasive argument begins with a strong hook or compelling statement that introduces the topic to the intended audience.
    • The position taken by the author is clearly evident throughout.
    • Word choice, tone, and points made are designed to resonate with the intended audience.
    • The persuasive argument presents a firm position that is supported by facts and examples from the Literature Review.
    • An opposing viewpoint is appropriately refuted and supported by facts and examples from the Literature Review.
    • The persuasive argument culminates with a brief compelling conclusion.

BY DAY 7

Submit your Assignment.

https://academichelp.net/samples/academics/essays/…

3 days ago

Full Text from ERIC Available online: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ902223

3 days ago

Porter, R. (2007). Why academics have a hard time writing good grant proposals. Journal of Research Administration, 38(2), 37–43.

3 days ago

Why Academics Have a Hard Time Writing Good Grant Proposals
Author(s):
Porter, Robert
Source:
Journal of Research Administration, v38 n2 p37-43 Fall 2007. 7 pp.
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
ISSN:
1539-1590
Descriptors:
Academic Discourse, Faculty Publishing, Writing for Publication, Proposal Writing, Comparative Analysis, Writing Skills, Researchers, Grants, Writing Strategies, Communication (Thought Transfer), Research Design, Peer Evaluation, Time Management, Higher Education
Abstract:
When they are new to the grant game, even scholars with fine publishing records can struggle with proposal writing. Many are surprised to find that the writing style that made them successful as academics is not well suited to crafting a winning proposal. To succeed at grant writing, most researchers need to learn a new set of writing skills. This paper discusses the contrasting perspectives of academic prose versus grant writing, and lists strategies grant specialists can use to help researchers break old habits and replace them with techniques better suited to the world of competitive grant proposals. (Contains 1 table.)
Abstractor:
ERIC
Number of References:
11
Number of Pages:
7
Publication Type:
Journal Articles; Reports – Descriptive
Availability:
Full Text from ERIC Available online: http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ902223
Society of Research Administrators International. 500 North Washington Street Suite 300, Falls Church, VA 22046. Tel: 703-741-0140; Fax: 703-741-0142; e-mail: membership@srainternational.org; Web site: http://www.srainternational.org
URL:
http://www.srainternational.org/sra03/template/tnt…
Journal Code:
JAN2017
Entry Date:
2010
Accession Number:
EJ902223
Database:
ERIC

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 6-12hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

If yes Order Paper Now