Penn State University Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Discussion


After reading Dilts, D. (2007). Case 15: Discharge for disruptive conduct, or for protected Union activity?, your group should come to a consensus as to the issues involved and conduct a legal analysis of those issues using the IRAC format discussed in the deep dive in this module. Your analysis should help you to determine whether or not there was a ULP. You can include a dissenting opinion for this case if you cannot achieve a consensus.

Submit that consensus in a brief group essay (500 word minimum). Choose one group member to attach your group’s essay in a reply to this Discussion. Please name your final response “Final Post”.

Important questions to answer in your analysis include:

  • Were company rules No. 18 and 29 in violation of NLRA?
  • Employees at times write articles or letters for newspapers openly critical of their employers. Should it make any difference in this case that Fuller himself was an editorial employee of a newspaper?
  • Although Fuller wrote and published the ?offensive? article on his own time, was his conduct protected under Section 7 of LMRA?
  • Do you believe Fuller?s discharge for rules violations was a pretext for terminating him because of his pro-union activities?
  • Make sure to consider whether or not there is a legal standard (i.e. case law) discussed in Chapter 4 that should help you to engage in this analysis.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 6-12hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

If yes Order Paper Now