Question Answered step-by-step All resources must be cited using and a reference list must be… All resources must be cited using and a reference list must be included. Points may be deducted for spelling, grammatical, and citation errorsor spelling errors. references/citations are present and correct the reference need to be 5 years. This is the assignment 1), Discuss the pathophysiologic differences between peripheral venous disease (PVD) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Purpose: Online discussions are designed to facilitate learning through collaboration, research, writing, and presentation of a concept or exemplar. Discussions will include a peer response that allows for reflection and further synthesis of the information presented.Directions: When writing your answer, try to use less quotations and more paraphrasing. For technical medical terms or sequences, quotations are appropriate. However if questioned as to the meaning, you should be able to put the meaning into your own words. The writing should demonstrate expansion and understanding of the topic.All resources must be cited using and a reference list must be included. Points may be deducted for spelling, grammatical, and citation errors.Grading: A rubric is provided that lists all of the grading components. Please review this separate document to ensure you meet all the requirements for full points. This assignment is worth 5 points. Late assignments will receive zero points. ExemplaryProficientDevelopingUnacceptableCommentsTotal Points3-2.76 Point(s)2.75-2.55 Point(s) 2.54-2.34 Point(s)2.33-0 Point(s) Quality of (Initial) Posting (based on insight, knowledge, analysis, and integration of concepts from readings or ideas of others)Posting demonstrates original, well-developed ideas in addition to in-depth synthesis, critical analysis, and integration of concepts or ideas. Posting stimulates further discussion. Uses three or more scholarly sources. Posting demonstrates well-developed ideas and integration of concepts from readings or ideas; synthesis, analysis, and/or integration of ideas noted that contributes to overall discussion.Uses only two scholarly sources. Posting demonstrates beginning idea development and understanding; some contribution to overall discussion. Uses one scholarly source. Posting demonstrates poor/inadequate idea development and understanding of pertinent concepts. Minimal contribution to overall discussion. 1-0.92 Point(s)0.91-0.88 Point(s)0.87-0.78 Point(s)0.78-0 Point(s) Quality of Reply Postings to PeersHigh level expansion of ideas of others are integrated with own ideas to expand discussion and contribute to it. Reply postings clearly indicate multiple other postings have been read and understood; expansion of discussion is significant.Strong expansion on the ideas of others (either respectfully supporting or refuting) contributes to the discussion significantly. Reply postings clearly indicate other postings have been read and understood; expansion of the discussion is evident.Beginning expansion of ideas of others contributes to discussion. Reply postings indicate other postings have been read and considered; some expansion of the overall discussion results.Beginning building upon ideas from others. Reply postings are brief and/or superficial, doing little to involve others or encourage others. Minimal evidence that other postings have been read and/or understood. 0.5-0.46 Point(s)0.45 Point(s)0.4 Point(s)0.39-0 Point(s) Mechanics of WritingIntegrates creative approach that enhances the discussion and is appropriate to the audience. Entire text flows smoothly with clear transitions. Entire document is well organized. Sentence structure varies appropriately. Rare errors in grammar and/or punctuation.Entire text flows smoothly with clear transitions. Entire posting is well organized. Sentence structure varies appropriately. Rare errors in grammar and/or punctuation.Writes in complete sentences. Transition of ideas generally smooth. Evidence that the posting has not been proofread before submission. Occasional errors in grammar and/or punctuation.Writes in incomplete, run-on or fragmented sentences. Posting could have benefitted from more careful proofreading and editing. Multiple errors of grammar and/or punctuation. 0.5-0.46 Point(s)0.45 Point(s)0.4 Point(s)0.39-0 Point(s)CommentsTotal PointsUse of Document complies with and guidelines with very rare error.Correctly applies document formatting. Literature citations are in correct . May be occasional error in Correctly applies document formatting guidelines. Literature citations has some errors in . May have some errors in references. Multiple errors in document formatting. Literature citations do not use correct Health Science Science Nursing NURSING NURSE1300 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 6-12hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now